Catullus’ Troy
fear of Phrygia in Neoteric Rome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25187/codex.v13i2.71936Palavras-chave:
Catulo , Troia, FrígiaResumo
Troy and Trojan lore plays an appreciable role in the extant poetry of Catullus, though to date there has been no systematic study of all of the allusions to Priam’s city and Phrygian mythology in his corpus. Close examination of the references to Troy in Catullus reveals a noteworthy concern with the Trojan element in the foundation lore of Rome, of interest both for a better understanding of the poet and as a precursor to Virgil’s more systematic engagement with the same themes in his epic.
Downloads
Referências
ARMSTRONG, R. “Journeys and Nostalgia in Catullus”, The Classical Journal, Vol. 109, No. 1 (October-November 2013), pp. 43-71.
BARBAUD, T. Catulle: Une poétique de l’indicible (Bibliothèque d’études classiques 47). Louvain-Paris-Dudley; Massachusetts: Peeters, 2006, pp. 96-102.
BARBIERO, E. “Lyric Letters: Reading the Epistolarity of Catullus c. 35 and 50”, Studi italiani di filologia classica 1, 2023, pp. 31-58.
BENARIO, H. W. “Caesar, Propaganda, and the Poets”, The Classical Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 2, Caesar (Oct. 19, 1956), pp. 22-4.
BIONDI, G. G. “Il carme 35 di Catullo”, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici, n. 41, 1998, pp. 35-69.
BRAUND, D. “The Politics of Catullus 10: Memmius, Caesar, and the Bithynians”, Hermathena, No. 160 (Summer 1996), pp. 45-57.
BRIGHT, D. F. “Confectum Carmine Munus: Catullus 68”, Illinois Classical Studies, Vol. 1 (1976), pp. 86-112.
CAIRNS, F. “Catullus 45: Text and Interpretation”, The Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 55, No. 2 (Dec., 2005), pp. 534-41.
CLAUSEN, W. V. “The New Direction in Poetry”. In: KENNEY, E. J. Kenney, (ed.). The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Volume II, Part 2, The Late Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983.
COPLEY, F. O. “Catullus, 35”, The American Journal of Philology, vol. 74, n. 2, 1953, pp. 149- 60.
DE VILLIERS, A. “The Liminality of Loss: Catullus on His Brother’s Death”, Acta Classica 63.1 (2020), pp. 111-24.
DIETZ, H. “Zu Catulls Gedicht von Acme und Septimius”, Symbolae Osloenses 44.1 (1969), pp. 42-7.
DUBAN, J. M. The Lesbian Lyre: Reclaiming Sappho for the 21st Century. Russet: Clairview Books Ltd., 2016.
DUFALLO, B. Disorienting Empire: Republican Latin Poetry’s Wanderers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, p. 173.
DU QUESNAY, I. “Three Poems in Poem 66”. In: DU QUESNAY, I.; WOODMAN, T. (eds.). Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012. pp. 153- 183.
FELDHERR, A. “Non inter nota sepulcra: Catullus 101 and Roman Funerary Ritual”, Classical Antiquity, Vol. 19, No. 2 (Oct., 2000), pp. 209-31.
FORDYCE, C. J. Catullus: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.
FORSYTH, P. Y. “Catullus: The Mythic Persona”, Latomus, T. 35, Fasc. 3 (juillet-septembre 1976), pp. 555-66.
FORSYTH, P. Y. “The Lady and the Poem: Catullus 35-42”, The Classical Journal, vol. 80, n. 1, Oct.-Nov. 1984, pp. 24-6.
FRATANTUONO, L.; BRAFF, J. “Communis Erinys: The Image of Helen in the Latin Poets”, L’Antiquité classique, T. 81 (2012), pp. 43-60.
FRATANTUONO, L. “Montium Domina: Catullus’ Diana, Rome, and the Moon’s Bastard Light”, Acta Classica, vol. 58, 2015, pp. 27-46.
FRATANTUONO, L. “Why Does Virgil’s Victorious Venus Vanish?” forthcoming in Hermathena.
FREDERICKSMEYER, E.A. “Catullus to Caecilius on Good Poetry (C. 35), The American Journal of Philology, vol. 106, n 2, Summer 1985, pp. 213-21.
HANSEN, W.S. “Caecilius’ Response to the Invitation in Catullus 35”, The Classical Journal, vol. 102, n. 3, Feb.-Mar. 2007, pp. 213-20.
HARKINS, P. W. “Autoallegory in Catullus 63 and 64”, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, Vol. 90 (1959), pp. 102-16.
HARRISON, S. “Altering Attis: Ethnicity, Gender, and Genre in Catullus 63”, Mnemosyne, Fourth Series, vol. 57, fasc. 5, Catullus 63, 2004, pp. 520-33.
HOCKINGS, T. R. J. “Notes on the Text and Interpretation of Catullus 101,” Mnemosyne, Vol. 71, Fasc. 4 (2018), pp. 693-701.
HUNINK, V. “Some Thoughts of a Friend”: Catul. 35,5-6”, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici, n. 45, 2000, pp. 133-36.
JOHNSON, M. “Catullus, c. 37, and the Theme of Magna Bella”, Helios 26.1 (1999), pp. 85-96.
KHAN, H. A. “Catullus 45: What Sort of Irony?”, Latomus, T. 27, Fasc. 1 (janvier-mars 1968), pp. 3-12.
KHAN, H. A. "Catullus 35 and the Things Poetry Can Do to You", Hermes, 102, 1974, pp. 475- 90.
KITZINGER, R. “Reading Catullus 45”, The Classical Journal, Vol. 87, No. 3 (Feb.-Mar., 1992), pp. 209-17.
KINSEY, T. “Some Problems in Catullus 68”, Latomus, T. 26, Fasc. 1 (janvier-mars 1967), pp. 35- 53.
KISS, D. “The Protohistory of the Text of Catullus”. In: VELAZA, J. (ed.). From the Protohistory to the History of the Text, Studien zur Klassischen Philologie, Band 173, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2016, pp. 125-40.
KRONENBERG, L. “Me, Myself, and I: Multiple (Literary) Personalities in Catullus 35", The Classical World, vol. 107, n. 3, Spring 2014, pp. 367-81.
KUTZO, D. “Lesbia in Catullus 35”, Classical Philology, vol. 101, n. 4, October 2006, pp. 405-10.
LEVENE, P. “Catullus c. 68: A New Perspective”, California Studies in Classical Antiquity, Vol. 9 (1976), pp. 61-88.
McCLURE, R. “The Structure of Catullus 68”, California Studies in Classical Antiquity, Vol. 7 (1974), pp. 215-29.
NAUTA, R. R. “Catullus 63 in a Roman Context”, Mnemosyne, Fourth Series, vol. 57, fasc. 5, Catullus 63, 2004, pp. 596-628.
NAUTA, R. R.; HARDER, A. (eds.). Catullus’ Poem on Attis: Text and Contexts. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2005.
PAPAIOANNOU, S. Redesigning Achilles (Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte, Band 89). Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2007.
PETRINI, M. The Child and the Hero: Coming of Age in Catullus and Vergil. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1997.
PUTNAM, M. C. J. “Virgil and the Achilles of Catullus”. In: MITSIS, P., ZIOGAS, I. (eds.). Wordplay and Powerplay in Latin Poetry. Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2016. pp. 151-68.
QUINN, K. Catullus: The Poems. London: Macmillan, 1973.
SEIDER, A. M. “Catullan Myths: Gender, Mourning, and the Death of a Brother”, Classical Antiquity, Vol. 35, No. 2 (October 2016), pp. 279 314.
SCHAFER, J. K. Catullus through his books: Dramas of Composition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
SCOTT, W. C. “Catullus and Caesar (c. 29)”, Classical Philology, vol. 66, n. 1, Jan. 1971, pp. 17- 25.
SIMPSON, C. J.; SIMPSON, B.G. “Catullus 46”, Latomus, T. 48, Fasc. 1 (janvier-mars 1989), pp. 75-85.
SKINNER, M. B. “Ego mulier: The Construction of Male Sexuality in Catullus”, Helios 20. 2, 1993, pp. 107-30.
SOMFAI, P. “Commune sepulcrum: The ‘Catullan’ Memory of Troy in Vergil’s Aeneid”, Acta Classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis 55 (2019), pp. 247-60.
SPAETH JR., J. W. “Caesar’s Friends and Enemies among the Poets”, The Classical Journal, Vol. 32, No. 9 (Jun., 1937), pp. 541-56.
SUERBAUM, W. “Trojanische Götter in Latium?”. In: SUERBAUM, W. Vergils Aeneis. Stuttgart: Reclams Universal-Bibliothek, 1999.
THOMAS, R. F. “An Alternative to Ceremonial Negligence (Catullus 68.73-78)”, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, Vol. 82 (1978), pp. 175 8.
THOMSON, D. F. S. Catullus: edited with Textual and Interpretive Commentary, Toronto, 1997, (corrected edition, 1998).
THORSEN, T. S.; HARRISON, S. (eds.). Roman Receptions of Sappho. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
TUPLIN, C. J.“Catullus 68”, The Classical Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 1 (1981), pp. 113-39.
WASDIN, K. Eros at Dusk: Ancient Wedding and Love Poetry. New York: Oxford, 2018.
WEST, D. Horace Odes III: Dulce Periculum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
WILTSHIRE, S. F. “Catullus Venustus”, The Classical World, vol. 70, n. 5, Feb. 1977, pp. 319-26.
WRAY, D. Catullus and the Poetics of Roman Manhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Lee Fratantuono
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
A Codex - Revista de Estudos Clássicos utiliza uma licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
Os autores dos trabalhos aprovados autorizam a revista a, após a publicação, ceder seu conteúdo para reprodução em indexadores de conteúdo, bibliotecas virtuais e similares.
A revista se permite o uso dos trabalhos publicados para fins não comerciais, incluindo o direito de enviar o trabalho para bases de dados de acesso público.
